Thirty Years with a Yellow Box: The Boss SD-1 Overdrive

As a guitarist you realise that overtime, there are pedals that come and go. There are the boutique wonders with their hand-painted graphics, the endless parade of cheap and ludicrously expensive clones, the supposedly “transparent” drives that promise to unlock some hidden truth in your guitar tone and your soul (if the internet is to believed #gamechanger). And then there’s the old Boss SD-1, and it is yellow.

I’ve had mine for nearly thirty years. It’s a small, battered yellow box, the paint chipped in the way only Boss enclosures seem to wear, a bit of electrical tape which seems to have fused with the case and around the edges the corners appear to have rounded off through the passage of time and the abuse of being stomped on year after year. The rubber tread on the footswitch has smoothed with use, and there’s dust an general gig greeb which you can never quite scrub out of the ridges.

When I first got it, it wasn’t a big purchase, although I had saved up doing a live sound gig to get it. The SD-1 was never really an expensive pedal (although it felt like it at the time £30). It was the also the kind of pedal you might find second-hand in a magical glass cabinet in the back of a guitar shop (remember them!), stacked alongside DS-1s, CE-2s (original ones!), TU-2s. But I needed to rock, so I needed an overdrive, it is what you had, it was always the first dalliance with pedals, you couldn’t be a guitarist without Dirt, and the DS1, well it was orange!. With the SD-1 there was something about the colour, about the simplicity, that drew me in. I certainly wasn’t chasing tone-shaping b*llshit philosophies back then. I just wanted to rock, but was limited by the power of my amp. I needed something that would make my amp (and my playing) destroy.

And that’s exactly what it did.

The Familiar

The SD-1 has was and never been about those BS marketing boutique adjectives and platitudes that seem to accompany every press release and instragram post. It doesn’t have “warmth” or “air” or “amp-like breakup.” It just has gain in the form of  asymmetric clipping, that other thing that people write essays about online. But gain and ‘pushing the front of an amp’ never felt like a spec to me, it was an embodied sensation, it felt like a….well I am not sure I could say on a public forum. I would just strike a chord, roll the volume up, dig in with my pick (Dunlop Jazz III red if you care): and it responded and I responded and the world disappeared. I was in a non-descript hall physically, but mentally I was a guitar god playing to an endless crowd.

Over the years I have run the SD-1 into practice amps (yeah not the best), into solid-state combos and racks (my beloved JMP-1 preamp), into tube amps when I could. Always the same: it just worked, no nonsense, no ego, just a great sound. A sound that no matter how many pedals I have owned, always ends back on the board. Of course, I would never say it was “perfect,” but it never got boring, never got sold on. It was slightly ragged, slightly thin, sometimes could even be a little harsh. But that was its sonic honesty, it wasn’t trying to be the mythical “transparent overdrive.” It was just the SD-1.

Thirty Years of Context

What’s strange is realising how the world of gear has changed around it, I guess this is showing mine and it’s age. When I first started using the SD-1, it was just another pedal from a very limited selection of pedals, inf fact pedals weren’t really even a thing. There was nothing mythical about it, Overdrive or Distortion, take your pick. Then of course thanks to the internet and the creation of bizarre pedal based mythos, boutique culture exploded. Suddenly, in every forum or YouTube video every circuit was analysed, cloned, re-boxed, or ‘modded’ and then marketed as the secret ingredient. Pedals became about exclusivity, waiting lists, the illusion of scarcity, ironically by people who perhaps should have spent less on pedals and more on lessons. (no it is always the pedal holding back your playing, never the fact you have never practiced….new pedal…better player)

Meanwhile, the my SD-1 just kept going, and Boss kept making them, seemingly cheap, ubiquitous, reliable and yellow. Like any Boss pedal you could drop it, spill beer on it, power it with a dying battery, drive over it with a car and it would still cough out overdrive.

I’ve used mine at gigs where nothing else worked properly, and it got me through. I’ve tracked guitars in studios around the world with it (even direct once in Cyprus….it didn’t sound good!), and its sound sits in mixes without fuss. Over the decades, other pedals came and went, but the SD-1 stayed on the board. Not out of nostalgia, but I guess out of trust.

A Pedal as Companion

After thirty years, I realise I don’t think of the SD-1 as a pedal anymore. It’s just part of my guitar presence. A companion. A bit of gear that has absorbed memory, sweat, dust, vomit (not mine!), pub grime, memories and time.

The thing is, that I realise now that when I step on it, I’m not just hearing ‘overdrive’. I’m hearing every rehearsal, every half-formed song idea, every small gig where the room buzzed with bad electrics, every late night, every journey in the back of a van, every attempt to put it in front of an amp trying to get the right feel. My SD-1 is a haunted box now, my own personal hauntological artifiact. A box not haunted by ghosts of vintage circuits, but by my own past and perhaps the lost futures I once dreamed of. The pedal is a continuity through decades of change.

The Point of all this…

If you ask me to “review” the SD-1, I can’t. It doesn’t make sense in the language of reviews. It isn’t “better” or “worse” than the countless overdrives I’ve tried since. It doesn’t win in blind tests, or in shoot-outs on YouTube. But after nearly thirty years, it’s still here. Still on the floor. Still doing its thing and perhaps that’s worth more than all the adjectives in the world.

Listening Online: What Social Media Tells Us About Soundscape

Listening Online: What Social Media Tells Us About Soundscape

We seemingly will happily describe a view, a meal, or a holiday in great detail, but without any reference to sound, to think of it, how many activities in life do we talk about focusing on the sound? And yet, if we look carefully, there is a substantial body of material where people do talk about sound, usually in the form of ‘noise’. You’ll find it on the endless scroll of social media.

The Places I Return : Echoes of hopes and dreams

The Places I Return : Echoes of hopes and dreams

here is a couple of benches I always return to, both of them small and otherwise unremarkable pieces of urban street furniture, one overlooking a strip of grass and an indifferent sky and the other at the intersection of brutalist concrete design and an ancient waterway, both in a city, a city that no matter what (even the fact I no longer live there) always is my spirtual home and birth place(London). For most of my formative years, right up until my 4th decade, these benches were my anchor, places to stop, think and be inspired, a hopes and dreams launchpad if you will.

Feeding the algorithm

Feeding the algorithm

Feeding the Algorithm is an ongoing series of experimental sound and video works made in partial refusal, partial complicity (oh the hypocrisy.) It emerges from a moment in which creativity is no longer judged by intensity, risk, or attention, but by frequency. To exist online is to remain active and to remain active is to produce/consume. Silence is treated not as creative time, flow or art but as failure.

Returning Sound to the Commons

Returning Sound to the Commons

am always teaching that sound is immediate, it enters our being before we can prepare, before thought can form a perceptual shield against it. From the time we are in the womb, before ‘King Sight’ (Walter Murch in Chion’s Audio Vision) has taken over we are learning and understanding about the our world through it, and then when we born, our existence in the world is to be immersed in it, pulled into relations that we do not choose but cannot escape. Unlike sight, a sense which allows for distance and framing, sound insists on intimacy, it places us inside the world and ourselves. Ever since, just over 50 years ago, R. Murray Schafer tried to “tune the world” and formalised the notion of ‘soundscape’ and thus soundscape studies which has lead increasing formalisation within the frameworks of academia and now government legislation (for example in the Noise and Soundscape Plan for Wales 2023-2028).

Understanding the Universal Category System (UCS)

Understanding the Universal Category System (UCS)

For those of us who are sound designers or field recordists, we all have tons of recordings which may or may not be well labelled or traceable once they get copied on to a hard drive. Being able to search, find and understand what a recording contains is a major requirement when working professionally, as a badly organised or unlabelled library becomes a veritable haystack from which you are trying to extract a needle! UCS offers a method which means you can easily work through your own and other professional sound libaries. Here is a practical introduction and how-to guide on what it is and how you can use it.

2026 and a Manifesto of Digital Absence

As we come back to the first week of the new year, a time that many of us think about resolutions and goals for the next 12 months, I have decided to do something different. This year I have decided to create a manifesto which addresses what I feel (perhaps personally) are the real challenges that I face both creatively and personally, and may be you do too.

The Manifesto comprises of 10 points of digital removal, so I (we) can become once again rooted in the real world and less in the virtual, making real art and real connections. Of course, the internet/digital technology/AI is here and not going away (and in someways is quite useful but in others extremely negative). Yet to me it is like the pub you really liked going to, in fact loved going to, but over the years has changed, a new crowd have taken over and it has been sold to a big bland corporation and so one (I) feels that it is time to find somewhere else to hang out. Through this I began thinking of how absence and the re-engagement with inconvenience (yep I really don’t need that USB Cable delivered in the next 3 hours, tomorrow or next week are seriously fine, if it was that urgent then I probably would have or be able to find a spare….you know by asking someone locally…which would be even quicker than A****n). It seems to me that the act of rebellion is no longer the traditional means of struggle, arms, protest but of removal and inconvenience. Checking out of the business model that controls our lives. I maybe wrong, but I am giving it a try, the ‘there is another way’ philosophy is coming back in a big way!

10 Commandments of Digital Absence.

1. We cannot turn it off.
A phrase that is heard so often! Yet why can’t we do it? It is not because we are weak, but because the digital world is designed that way. Every notification is a lever to pull to feed a slot machine. Your compulsion to be digital is not an accident; it is the business model. You can step back or limit your interaction with the digital dopamine hit.

2. We cannot turn it off.
Because the social, political and cultural system seemingly requires it. Work, banking, medicine, love, all of these are now routed through digital screens, interaction with the world through the means of a swipe. To “opt out”, step back or disconnect seems risk exclusion from the conditions of survival in the modern world. Is there another way, yes of course. This doesn’t mean returning to the past, it doesn’t mean switching off completely, but it might mean inconvenience.

3. We cannot turn it off.
Because we have allowed our identities to be subjugated and bound to it. To be unseen or not present in the digital world is to be irrelevant. Isn’t it strange how employers, family, peers, strangers all demand visibility for us? To be silence can’t be read as failure, to outcast oneself. Absence is treated as deviance.

4. Anxiety is the rhythm of the machine.
A new level of anxiety tied to the phone buzz in our pocket or the absence of the buzz, we seemingly twitch and fidget to answer a ghost vibrations. Time itself has been colonised by a machine driven by the requirements of corporate attention: refresh, reply, repeat. To resist feels dangerous. To silence one’s device feels like guilt. There is no need to disappear, but to acknowledge that most things are not that urgent. Sometime reflection is much better than impulse.

5. Absence is rebellion.
Isn’t it funny that in just 15 years or so the refusal to post, to leave a message unanswered, to let time dilate into slowness is considered sabotage, an act or rebellion. To not post through personal agency is to get your work demonetised, as you are not a good digital citizen feeding the content beast. This is not apathy but refusal, the new resistance.

6. Absence must be collective.
This post could read as a ‘lifestyle’ hack, as one person disconnecting is a lifestyle provocation. However, if a community disconnects this then is a disruption. Yet if a culture disconnects, this is a revolution. If we could withdraw together (not fully remove or stop, but simply pull back) we could reclaim the tempo of ‘real’ life.

7. The blackout is already coming.
I am trying not to be too pessimistic, but realistic, we have already seen the effects of storms, cyberattacks, grid failures on digital resources, systems, infrastructures and whole regions have gone dark. The reliance on digital tech and the removal or analogue (eg copper wiring for telecomms) may also become more problematic given the changes in climate which are occuring. There is no denying that either by physical or malicious means machines will go dark. What is interesting is when they do currently, we rediscover how fragile the “always-on” world truly is. Don’t through the analogue baby away with the bathwater. Remember how to connect with the tactility of past technology, the analogue can be bodged to work again. The digital is throw-away.

8. The paradox remains.
Being alone and absent liberates the self but abandons the world. Yet absence from the digital may threaten the collapse of modern digital systems, but also opens the possibility of a new real connections.

9. To practice absence is to prepare.
Here comes the reality for me, in 2026 I am going to support and build the offline commons. Learn and relearn analogue skills. I want to value boredom, slowness, silence. I want to refuse the demand to be always-available, always-productive, always-visible.

10. The unthinkable gesture.
So, this is the rub, it feels that to turn it off, that is truly off is almost unimaginable in 2026. I feel that precisely because it is unimaginable, it is necessary. It a way to make a crack in inevitability of what we are told is to come and a reminder that this life is not destiny.

To start my creative journey in 2026, I am continuing to work on my ‘feeding the algorithm’ series, here is the first work.